4 | ||
1 |
3 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
2 |
2 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 |
4 | ||
2 | ||
2 | ||
2 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 | ||
1 |
2 | ||
2 | ||
2 | ||
1 | ||
1 |
The Platform Vector Gene Therapies Project: Increasing the Efficiency of Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Startup.Brooks P, Ottinger E, Portero D, Lomash RM, Alimardanov A, Terse P, Xu X, Chandler RJ, Geist Hauserman J, Esposito E, Bönnemann CG, Venditti CP, Austin C, Pariser A, Lo DHum Gene Ther , (31), 1034-1042, 2020. Article Pubmed |
The past, present, and future of modeling Cockayne Syndrome - A commentary on "Rat Model of Cockayne Syndrome Neurological Disease".Pacak CA, Brooks PDNA Repair (Amst.) , (88), 102788, 2020. Article Pubmed |
Therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic modalities, progress and challenges ahead.Tambuyzer E, Vandendriessche B, Austin C, Brooks P, Larsson K, Miller Needleman KI, Valentine J, Davies K, Groft SC, Preti R, Oprea TI, Prunotto MNat Rev Drug Discov , (19), 93-111, 2020. Article Pubmed Most rare diseases still lack approved treatments despite major advances in research providing the tools to understand their molecular basis, as well as legislation providing regulatory and economic incentives to catalyse the development of specific therapies. Addressing this translational gap is a multifaceted challenge, for which a key aspect is the selection of the optimal therapeutic modality for translating advances in rare disease knowledge into potential medicines, known as orphan drugs. With this in mind, we discuss here the technological basis and rare disease applicability of the main therapeutic modalities, including small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, protein replacement therapies, oligonucleotides and gene and cell therapies, as well as drug repurposing. For each modality, we consider its strengths and limitations as a platform for rare disease therapy development and describe clinical progress so far in developing drugs based on it. We also discuss selected overarching topics in the development of therapies for rare diseases, such as approval statistics, engagement of patients in the process, regulatory pathways and digital tools.
|
Genome editing to 're-write' wrongs.Perry ME, Valdes KM, Wilder E, Austin C, Brooks PNat Rev Drug Discov , 2018. Article Pubmed |
Gene Therapy: The View from NCATS.Brooks P, Yang NN, Austin CHum. Gene Ther. , (27), 7-13, 2016. Article Pubmed |
Cockayne syndrome (CS) is a devastating neurodevelopmental disorder, with growth abnormalities, progeriod features, and sun sensitivity. CS is typically considered to be a DNA repair disorder, since cells from CS patients have a defect in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER). However, cells from UV-sensitive syndrome patients also lack TC-NER, but these patients do not suffer from the neurologic and other abnormalities that CS patients do. Also, the neurologic abnormalities that affect CS patients (CS neurologic disease) are qualitatively different from those seen in NER-deficient XP patients. Therefore, the TC-NER defect explains the sun sensitive phenotype common to both CS and UVsS, but cannot explain CS neurologic disease. However, as CS neurologic disease is of much greater clinical significance than the sun sensitivity, there is a pressing need to understand its molecular basis. While there is evidence for defective repair of oxidative DNA damage and mitochondrial abnormalities in CS cells, here I propose that the defects in transcription by both RNA polymerases I and II that have been documented in CS cells provide a better explanation for many of the severe growth and neurodevelopmental defects in CS patients than defective DNA repair. The implications of these ideas for interpreting results from mouse models of CS, and for the development of treatments and therapies for CS patients are discussed.
|
Quantitative assessment of Tet-induced oxidation products of 5-methylcytosine in cellular and tissue DNA.Liu S, Wang J, Su Y, Guerrero C, Zeng Y, Mitra D, Brooks P, Fisher DE, Song H, Wang YNucleic Acids Res. , (41), 6421-9, 2013. Article Pubmed Recent studies showed that Ten-eleven translocation (Tet) family dioxygenases can oxidize 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine (5-mdC) in DNA to yield the 5-hydroxymethyl, 5-formyl and 5-carboxyl derivatives of 2'-deoxycytidine (5-HmdC, 5-FodC and 5-CadC). 5-HmdC in DNA may be enzymatically deaminated to yield 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (5-HmdU). After their formation at CpG dinucleotide sites, these oxidized pyrimidine nucleosides, particularly 5-FodC, 5-CadC, and 5-HmdU, may be cleaved from DNA by thymine DNA glycosylase, and subsequent action of base-excision repair machinery restores unmethylated cytosine. These processes are proposed to be important in active DNA cytosine demethylation in mammals. Here we used a reversed-phase HPLC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS/MS) method, along with the use of stable isotope-labeled standards, for accurate measurements of 5-HmdC, 5-FodC, 5-CadC and 5-HmdU in genomic DNA of cultured human cells and multiple mammalian tissues. We found that overexpression of the catalytic domain of human Tet1 led to marked increases in the levels of 5-HmdC, 5-FodC and 5-CadC, but only a modest increase in 5-HmdU, in genomic DNA of HEK293T cells. Moreover, 5-HmdC is present at a level that is approximately 2-3 and 3-4 orders of magnitude greater than 5-FodC and 5-CadC, respectively, and 35-400 times greater than 5-HmdU in the mouse brain and skin, and human brain. The robust analytical method built a solid foundation for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of active cytosine demethylation, for measuring these 5-mdC derivatives and assessing their involvement in epigenetic regulation in other organisms and for examining whether these 5-mdC derivatives can be used as biomarkers for human diseases.
|